Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Trump From Deploying Natl. Guard to Portland

A federal judge in Oregon, Karin Immergut, has issued a temporary restraining order stopping the Trump administration from sending National Guard troops to Portland. This decision comes after President Trump announced plans to deploy troops to protect what he called a “war-ravaged” city. The judge, who was appointed by Trump, found that Oregon and Portland are likely to succeed in their argument that the president overstepped his constitutional authority, specifically violating the Tenth Amendment.

Critics of the ruling argue that the Constitution gives the president power as commander in chief, including over the state militias when called into service. However, Judge Immergut ruled that the recent protests cited by the administration do not rise to the level requiring military intervention and can be managed by regular law enforcement. She expressed concern that the administration’s arguments blurred the line between civil and military powers.

The Trump administration claimed that the National Guard would not serve in a law enforcement capacity, which would violate the Posse Comitatus Act, but would instead protect federal property from violent protests. Judge Immergut’s decision does not seem to consider Portland’s restrictions on local law enforcement cooperation with federal officers, nor the president’s constitutional role as military leader.

The restraining order will expire on October 18, though Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield plans to seek an extension. Meanwhile, the Trump administration intends to appeal the ruling to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Rayfield stated the order returns control of the National Guard to Oregon Governor Tina Kotek.

State and city leaders welcomed the ruling, asserting that Portland had not experienced a rebellion or breakdown of order that would justify federal troop deployment. They view the decision as a necessary check on presidential power based on evidence and law.

Governor Kotek called the ruling “a step in the right direction,” urging President Trump to respect the court and reconsider his plans.

Related Posts

“Protecting my kids’ privacy became an eye-opening journey that ultimately taught our entire family an unforgettable lesson about boundaries, safety, and the importance of choosing what to share, what to hold close, and how to navigate a world that demands visibility without sacrificing our well-being.”

The text recounts a deeply personal experience centered on the profound importance of protecting a child’s privacy, especially in the modern era when digital exposure can happen…

“Just minutes ago, in a dramatic turn of events within the Kingdom, King Charles delivered an unexpectedly emotional announcement that left the nation stunned, revealing a life-changing decision involving Prince William that promises to reshape the royal family’s future in ways no one could have imagined.”

The narrative centers on a wave of global curiosity triggered by unverified media reports describing an emotional and intimate exchange between King Charles III and Prince William….

Creative Man Transforms 11 Shipping Containers Into His 2,500-Square-Foot Dream Home, Combining Innovation, Sustainability, and Modern Design, Resulting in an Incredible Interior That Surprises and Inspires, Showcasing How Unconventional Materials Can Be Turned Into Stylish, Functional, and Truly Unique Living Spaces.

Designer Will Breaux turned his unconventional dream into reality by constructing a home made entirely out of shipping containers, an innovative design that has captured the imagination…

The Unexpected Phone Call That Transformed an Ordinary, Quiet Afternoon into a Hilarious, Laugh-Out-Loud Memory, Creating a Joyful Moment of Spontaneous Humor, Connection, and Delight That Left Everyone Smiling, Highlighting How Small, Unplanned Events Can Brighten Our Days and Become Cherished Stories.

It was a seemingly ordinary afternoon at the country club, the kind of quiet, sunlit day that invites members to linger over lunch, enjoy a game of…

Johnson Claims That a Hidden Clause in the Funding Agreement Has Undermined Transparency, Raising Concerns About Accountability, Oversight, and Trust in the Process, While Prompting Calls for Greater Clarity, Public Disclosure, and Reforms to Ensure Fairness and Integrity in Future Financial Arrangements.

A seemingly routine government funding bill has unexpectedly become a flashpoint for partisan debate, drawing attention to surveillance practices employed during ongoing Jan. 6 investigations. The Senate’s…

Upcoming Supreme Court Decision Could Dramatically Reshape U.S. Deportation Procedures, Potentially Altering How Cases Are Reviewed, Processed, and Challenged, While Influencing Immigrant Rights, Federal Enforcement Power, Due-Process Standards, and the Future Legal Landscape Surrounding Removal Orders and Administrative Authority Across the Nation.

The Supreme Court recently issued a landmark decision in a 6–3 ruling that fundamentally alters the landscape of U.S. immigration enforcement. By granting the federal administration expanded…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *