Federal Judge Allows Lawsuit Over Delayed Visa Applications to Proceed

A federal judge has allowed a lawsuit brought by three foreign nationals to move forward against U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, challenging lengthy delays in the processing of their EB-1A visa applications. The plaintiffs, professionals from Kazakhstan and Russia, argue that their petitions have been stalled in administrative processing for over 16 months without a final decision.

The EB-1A visa is designed for individuals with exceptional ability in fields such as science, business, or the arts. The plaintiffs’ cases were placed under Section 221(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which allows temporary visa refusals while additional administrative steps are taken. The lawsuit seeks a court order requiring the government to make a final determination on the applications.

The delays have caused significant hardship for the plaintiffs. One applicant, a metallurgist from Kazakhstan, says she has been separated from her daughter, a U.S. citizen, for nearly two years. The other two plaintiffs say the uncertainty has disrupted their personal and professional lives, causing emotional and financial strain.

The U.S. government attempted to dismiss the case, citing consular nonreviewability and sovereign immunity. These doctrines usually protect the government from legal challenges related to visa decisions. However, Magistrate Judge Zia M. Faruqui ruled that these doctrines do not apply because the plaintiffs have not yet received final decisions on their cases.

Judge Faruqui cited the Administrative Procedure Act, which allows courts to compel federal agencies to act when they fail to fulfill clear legal duties. He also invoked the Accardi doctrine, which requires agencies to follow their own rules and procedures. The court found the delays potentially unlawful and emphasized that indefinite inaction is not permissible.

The case now moves forward, potentially setting a precedent for others facing similar visa processing delays. The court will next determine whether the delays are legally unreasonable under federal law.

Related Posts

Senate Republicans Confirm More Than 100 Trump Nominees

Senate Republicans voted Tuesday to confirm over 100 of President Donald Trump’s nominees in one large batch, clearing a significant backlog of pending appointments. This was made…

Chicago PD Ordered to Ignore Border Patrol Agents Trapped By Violent Mob

Chicago police officers were reportedly instructed to stand down during a violent incident in which federal agents were attacked near an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility,…

Democratic Party Faces Internal Struggles Amid Government Shutdown

A recent op-ed in The Hill highlights significant challenges facing the Democratic Party amid the ongoing government shutdown. Written by a former Wall Street executive and conservative…

Stephen Miller Clashes With CNN Host Over Immigration Crackdown Questions

A tense exchange unfolded on CNN between White House senior adviser Stephen Miller and host Boris Sanchez regarding the Trump administration’s renewed immigration enforcement efforts. The discussion…

James Comey To Face Federal Arraignment Following Indictment for Allegedly Lying to Congress

Former FBI Director James Comey is set to appear voluntarily in a Virginia federal court on October 9, facing charges of obstruction of justice and making false…

Writer’s Take On State Of American Left Should Panic Democrats

Noah Smith’s recent analysis offers a rare, balanced perspective on the current state of American politics. While some of his language may be provocative, his effort to…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *