Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi faced criticism after incorrectly referencing a non-existent “Article 10” of the U.S. Constitution. She used this supposed article to challenge President Donald Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops and U.S. Marines to Los Angeles amid riots.

Pelosi claimed the president needed the governor’s consent before activating the National Guard, citing “section 12046 of Article 10.” However, the Constitution contains only seven articles, making her reference inaccurate.

Experts clarified Pelosi likely meant Title 10 of the U.S. Code. Title 10 allows the president to federalize the National Guard without requiring the governor’s permission. This authority has been upheld by the Supreme Court and has been exercised by presidents like Lyndon B. Johnson.

Additionally, Pelosi claimed Trump refused to send the National Guard during the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot. This assertion was disputed by former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund, who explained he was legally prevented from requesting federal support without approval from Pelosi-appointed Capitol Police Board members.

Despite these controversies, public opinion largely supports Trump’s decision to deploy troops to Los Angeles. Polling from RMG Research shows that 52% of voters approved of the troop deployment, while 42% disapproved, and 7% remained undecided.

The unrest in Los Angeles was triggered by ICE operations targeting convicted illegal immigrants, resulting in over 100 arrests. Voters also showed support for these ICE actions, with 57% approving and 35% disapproving.

Pelosi’s constitutional mistake and disputed Jan. 6 narrative sparked debate, but they did not sway public support significantly. Many voters backed the administration’s efforts to manage the recent crisis.

The situation highlights ongoing tensions around federal versus state authority during civil unrest and emphasizes the importance of accurate constitutional knowledge in political discourse.