Former U.S. President Donald Trump has publicly accused global music icon Beyoncé of receiving $11 million in exchange for supporting Vice President Kamala Harris at a 2024 campaign event. Trump made the explosive allegation in a recent statement, insisting that the payment was illegal and demanding a formal criminal investigation into the matter.

The accusation comes amid heightened political tensions as the 2024 presidential race intensifies. Trump, who is once again a key figure in the Republican campaign, framed the alleged transaction as an example of corruption in Democratic circles. He claimed that Beyoncé’s public support was not a voluntary endorsement but a paid political act disguised as a cultural performance.

However, there is currently no evidence to support Trump’s claims. Official financial disclosures from the Harris campaign show only a payment of $165,000 related to production costs for the event where Beyoncé appeared. These expenses are standard for high-profile events and fall within the legal boundaries of campaign finance regulations.

Representatives from both the Harris campaign and Beyoncé’s team have strongly denied the allegations. In a joint response, they stated that the singer was not paid for political support and emphasized that her appearance was neither arranged nor compensated as Trump suggested. They labeled Trump’s remarks as baseless, misleading, and politically motivated.

Legal analysts have noted that Trump’s demand lacks merit without substantiated proof. “Campaign finance laws are clear, and unless there’s documentation of a direct payment for political endorsement, there’s no case,” one expert commented. The Federal Election Commission has not announced any inquiry or findings related to the claim.

The incident highlights the ongoing tension between political figures and celebrities, especially when high-profile artists use their platforms to express political opinions. While celebrity endorsements have long played a role in U.S. politics, allegations like these—absent concrete evidence—are often seen as attempts to distract or provoke headlines during a heated election cycle. As of now, no investigation has been launched, and the accusation remains unproven.