Donald Trump’s newest push to “clean up” Washington, D.C. has plunged the capital into political chaos, sparking outrage from city officials, civil rights advocates, and online critics — and even prompting renewed calls for impeachment.

On Monday, the president unveiled what he called a “no Mr. Nice Guy” crackdown on crime, a sweeping, month-long federal takeover of the city’s Metropolitan Police Department. The plan involves deploying 800 National Guard troops to patrol the streets and ordering all homeless encampments to “move out IMMEDIATELY.”

“Before the tents, squalor, filth, and Crime, it was the most beautiful Capital in the World. It will soon be that again,” Trump wrote on Truth Social, framing the city as a “sanctuary for illegal alien criminals” plagued by “lawlessness.”

His rhetoric leaned heavily on comparisons to some of the world’s most dangerous cities, claiming D.C.’s homicide rate now surpasses Bogotá and Mexico City — despite FBI data showing violent crime at a 30-year low. To justify the federal takeover, Trump cited Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, giving him temporary authority over local law enforcement.

The most controversial line came during a press briefing at the White House, where Trump said police should have free rein when met with resistance.

“That’s the only language they understand,” he told reporters. “You spit, and we hit, and they can hit real hard.”

The remarks immediately lit up social media. One Reddit user wrote, “The Trump police state is upon us.” Others called it “a road map to unchecked police violence,” warning that such statements normalize brutality under the guise of law and order.

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, while noting she was “not totally surprised” given Trump’s past rhetoric, called the move “unsettling and unprecedented,” adding that her administration had not requested federal intervention.

The controversy over D.C. comes just weeks after Trump faced a legal challenge over his deployment of the National Guard during immigration protests in Los Angeles this past June — a move made without the California governor’s consent. State officials argued it was a violation of the core constitutional principle that governors control their own Guard units. The Trump administration insists the action was lawful under existing federal statutes.

For Trump, however, the political message is clear and deliberate. He has framed the D.C. operation not as an overreach, but as a patriotic reclamation. “This is liberation day in D.C.,” he declared. “We’re going to take our capital back.”

Still, the operation has triggered fresh speculation over whether this kind of unilateral law enforcement control could become a precedent in other U.S. cities — and whether it could backfire politically, especially as his critics begin openly discussing impeachment as a response to what they see as authoritarian governance.