In an unprecedented political clash, Texas Governor Greg Abbott petitioned the state Supreme Court to remove Democratic Caucus Chair Rep. Gene Wu after House Democrats fled the state to block a vote on a proposed congressional map. Abbott urged the court to act swiftly, within 48 hours, but the justices instead set a three-week schedule, pushing final briefs past the current special legislative session’s end.

Despite the delay, Abbott celebrated the court’s decision as a step toward holding Democrats accountable. The lawsuit against Wu has been merged with a similar suit by Attorney General Ken Paxton, who now supports Abbott’s push, despite earlier disagreements over legal authority. Paxton said he looks forward to “hold these cowards accountable.”

The Democratic walkout on August 3 was aimed at breaking quorum to prevent passage of a redistricting plan influenced by former President Trump, who has pressured Texas Republicans to deliver five additional GOP seats in Congress ahead of the 2026 midterms. Democrats decry the map as partisan gerrymandering, though they’ve not opposed similar tactics in blue states.

Wu’s lawyers argue that his absence is not grounds for removal, asserting that he acts on behalf of constituents opposing the legislation. They emphasize that Wu hasn’t resigned or been expelled through proper constitutional channels. No U.S. governor has ever successfully removed lawmakers for breaking quorum.

The Texas Supreme Court, composed entirely of Republicans—many appointed by Abbott—faces political pressure in the case. Legal experts note the justices’ ties to the governor could create a perception of bias, complicating their role in a politically charged case.

As deadlines for candidate filings near, Republicans grow anxious. Abbott may continue calling special sessions, but administrative timelines could soon render the redistricting effort irrelevant for the 2026 elections if no progress is made.