In the wake of conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s tragic assassination, news outlets around the world have been covering the event extensively. However, U.S. celebrity news outlet TMZ is facing intense backlash after laughter and applause were heard during their live broadcast reporting Kirk’s death. The incident has sparked outrage on social media, with many accusing TMZ of mocking the killing of a public figure and family man.
The controversy began when TMZ streamed live coverage following the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk, who was struck in the neck during a speaking event at Utah Valley University. As co-hosts Harvey Levin and Charles Latibeaudiere solemnly announced Kirk’s death, background sounds of cheering and laughter were heard. This prompted immediate outrage online, with users accusing TMZ of celebrating the assassination. Some even labeled the moment “disgusting,” including conservative commentator Laura Loomer.
Criticism escalated rapidly. One viral post alleged that TMZ employees were “cheering, clapping, and celebrating” just 30 seconds before the news of Kirk’s death was delivered. The perception that the network had mocked a political assassination infuriated viewers from both sides of the political aisle, sparking calls for accountability and an explanation.
In response, TMZ quickly issued a public apology, including a video posted to X (formerly Twitter) featuring Levin and Latibeaudiere. They clarified that the background noise was not related to Kirk’s death. According to Levin, the noise came from a separate group of employees watching a car chase in another room. He insisted that if the laughter had been about Kirk’s assassination, those responsible would no longer be employed at TMZ. Latibeaudiere echoed the sentiment, acknowledging the poor timing and offering a direct apology.
To further address the situation, TMZ published a written statement reinforcing their explanation. The network reiterated that while the laughter was unrelated to the assassination, it was still “tone deaf” to be reacting to any other event so audibly during a tragedy. They admitted the incident was “totally out of line” and apologized to anyone who may have interpreted it differently.
The controversy underscores the sensitivity required in live reporting—especially during moments of national mourning. Though TMZ maintains the laughter wasn’t directed at Kirk, the timing has left a lasting negative impression. As tributes continue to pour in for Charlie Kirk, many still demand higher standards of professionalism from media outlets covering such profound tragedies.
