On Sunday, Iran’s parliament approved a dramatic measure to close the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial maritime passage through which approximately 20% of the world’s oil and gas supplies flow. The move, widely seen as a response to recent U.S. military strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities, now awaits approval by Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, the body with ultimate authority on national defense matters. If enacted, this closure could severely disrupt global energy markets and heighten tensions across the Middle East.
The recent escalation began with U.S. precision airstrikes targeting Iran’s nuclear sites in Natanz, Esfahan, and Fordow. These operations reportedly involved Tomahawk cruise missiles and B-2 stealth bombers, signaling a firm American stance against Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Iranian officials had previously warned that blocking the strait would be a likely retaliation for any such military actions.
Revolutionary Guards Commander Esmail Kosari reiterated that Iran sees closing the strait as a legitimate strategic response, especially under direct military threat. The Strait of Hormuz—a narrow waterway just 21 miles wide at its narrowest point—links the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. It is vital for the energy needs of countries like Japan, South Korea, and China, making its stability essential for the global economy. Any disruption could cause immediate spikes in oil and gas prices worldwide.
Despite heightened rhetoric, shipping operations have not yet changed dramatically. Major global carriers, including Danish conglomerate Maersk, announced their vessels will continue regular transit through the strait for now. However, Maersk remains in close communication with regional security agencies and maritime authorities and pledged to reroute or halt shipments if security deteriorates.
On the defense front, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed that while the airstrikes were “extensive and strategically necessary,” the U.S. does not intend to engage in a ground war with Iran. Hegseth emphasized Washington’s commitment to containing nuclear threats without escalating to full-scale conflict and urged allies to prepare for potential fallout, though no new military deployments beyond current forces are planned.
As the world watches, the evolving situation in the Strait of Hormuz carries significant geopolitical and economic implications. Energy markets remain volatile, diplomatic channels are strained, and analysts warn that a misstep could ignite a broader conflict. Whether Iran proceeds with closing the strait or not, global powers are bracing for developments that could reshape regional dynamics and challenge international energy security.
